Issue No. 182
Sep 2021
Issue No. 230
Sep 2025
Issue No. 229
Aug 2025
Issue No. 228
Jul 2025
Issue No. 227
Jun 2025
Issue No. 226
May 2025
Issue No. 225
Apr 2025
Issue No. 224
Mar 2025
Issue No. 223
Feb 2025
Issue No. 222
Jan 2025
Issue No. 221
Dec 2024
Issue No. 220
Nov 2024
Issue No. 219
Oct 2024
Issue No. 218
Sep 2024
Issue No. 217
Aug 2024
Issue No. 216
Jul 2024
Issue No. 215
Jun 2024
Issue No. 214
May 2024
Issue No. 213
Apr 2024
Issue No. 212
Mar 2024
Issue No. 211
Feb 2024
Issue No. 210
Jan 2024
Issue No. 209
Dec 2023
Issue No. 208
Nov 2023
Issue No. 207
Oct 2023
Issue No. 206
Sep 2023
Issue No. 205
Aug 2023
Issue No. 204
Jul 2023
Issue No. 203
Jun 2023
Issue No. 202
May 2023
Issue No. 201
Apr 2023
Issue No. 200
Mar 2023
Issue No. 199
Feb 2023
Issue No. 198
Jan 2023
Issue No. 197
Dec 2022
Issue No. 196
Nov 2022
Issue No. 195
Oct 2022
Issue No. 194
Sep 2022
Issue No. 193
Aug 2022
Issue No. 192
Jul 2022
Issue No. 191
Jun 2022
Issue No. 190
May 2022
Issue No. 189
Apr 2022
Issue No. 188
Mar 2022
Issue No. 187
Feb 2022
Issue No. 186
Jan 2022
Issue No. 185
Dec 2021
Issue No. 184
Nov 2021
Issue No. 183
Oct 2021
Issue No. 181
Aug 2021
Issue No. 180
Jul 2021
Issue No. 179
Jun 2021
Issue No. 178
May 2021
Issue No. 177
Apr 2021
Issue No. 176
Mar 2021
Issue No. 175
Feb 2021
Issue No. 174
Jan 2021
Issue No. 173
Dec 2020
Issue No. 172
Nov 2020
Issue No. 171
Oct 2020
Issue No. 170
Sep 2020
Issue No. 169
Aug 2020
Issue No. 168
Jul 2020
Issue No. 167
Jun 2020
Issue No. 166
May 2020
Issue No. 165
Apr 2020
Past issues

7th Year Greater China Legal History Seminar Series 2021-22

The 7th Year Greater China Legal History Seminar Series organised by CUHK LAW will begin from September 2021. The first seminar, "The Small House Policy and the Court of Appeal", will be delivered online by Mr. Malcolm MERRY from the University of Hong Kong.

"The Small House Policy and the Court of Appeal" (10 September 2021)


In January this year after months of deliberation Hong Kong's Court of Appeal decided that the Small House Policy in its entirety is constitutional and therefore protected by Article 40 of the Basic Law. In doing so, the court partially reversed the judgment of the Court of First Instance that one aspect of the policy was not constitutional.

The Court of Appeal took a different approach from that of the trial judge to the assessment of the meaning of 'the lawful traditional rights and interests of New Territories indigenous inhabitants' and whether the small house grants come within that phrase. This assessment involved an account of the history of housing in rural areas.


This seminar will recount, explain and examine the Court of Appeal's reasons. It will suggest that the court's historical account is not entirely accurate and involves some questionable interpretation.


Details and registration: https://bit.ly/3jzuFTH


20210830151043jpeg


20210830151050jpeg

Back