Issue No. 222
Jan 2025
Issue No. 230
Sep 2025
Issue No. 229
Aug 2025
Issue No. 228
Jul 2025
Issue No. 227
Jun 2025
Issue No. 226
May 2025
Issue No. 225
Apr 2025
Issue No. 224
Mar 2025
Issue No. 223
Feb 2025
Issue No. 221
Dec 2024
Issue No. 220
Nov 2024
Issue No. 219
Oct 2024
Issue No. 218
Sep 2024
Issue No. 217
Aug 2024
Issue No. 216
Jul 2024
Issue No. 215
Jun 2024
Issue No. 214
May 2024
Issue No. 213
Apr 2024
Issue No. 212
Mar 2024
Issue No. 211
Feb 2024
Issue No. 210
Jan 2024
Issue No. 209
Dec 2023
Issue No. 208
Nov 2023
Issue No. 207
Oct 2023
Issue No. 206
Sep 2023
Issue No. 205
Aug 2023
Issue No. 204
Jul 2023
Issue No. 203
Jun 2023
Issue No. 202
May 2023
Issue No. 201
Apr 2023
Issue No. 200
Mar 2023
Issue No. 199
Feb 2023
Issue No. 198
Jan 2023
Issue No. 197
Dec 2022
Issue No. 196
Nov 2022
Issue No. 195
Oct 2022
Issue No. 194
Sep 2022
Issue No. 193
Aug 2022
Issue No. 192
Jul 2022
Issue No. 191
Jun 2022
Issue No. 190
May 2022
Issue No. 189
Apr 2022
Issue No. 188
Mar 2022
Issue No. 187
Feb 2022
Issue No. 186
Jan 2022
Issue No. 185
Dec 2021
Issue No. 184
Nov 2021
Issue No. 183
Oct 2021
Issue No. 182
Sep 2021
Issue No. 181
Aug 2021
Issue No. 180
Jul 2021
Issue No. 179
Jun 2021
Issue No. 178
May 2021
Issue No. 177
Apr 2021
Issue No. 176
Mar 2021
Issue No. 175
Feb 2021
Issue No. 174
Jan 2021
Issue No. 173
Dec 2020
Issue No. 172
Nov 2020
Issue No. 171
Oct 2020
Issue No. 170
Sep 2020
Issue No. 169
Aug 2020
Issue No. 168
Jul 2020
Issue No. 167
Jun 2020
Issue No. 166
May 2020
Issue No. 165
Apr 2020
Past issues

10th Year Greater China Legal History Seminar Series – "Crying for Justice: The Impact of Public Opinion on the Local Judiciary during Ming" (10 January 2025)

The next seminar of the 10th Year Greater China Legal History Seminar Series organised by CUHK LAW titled "Crying for Justice: The Impact of Public Opinion on the Local Judiciary during Ming" will be delivered by Dr. Ka-chai TAM, Associate Professor, Department of History, Hong Kong Baptist University on 10 January 2025.

About the seminar: The local judicial court of Ming China is basically an open system, as judicial procedures are all open to the public without much restrictions. Although there are requirements of solemn silence for the observers, but no strict restrictions are enforced to prohibit the family members and neighbours of the two sides to cry for justice. In the due course of the hearing, the observing neighbours of the accused sometimes might also be summoned to comment and even guarantee the integrity of the accused, so that the judge might measure the degree of punishments accordingly. Moreover, after the local courts made the decision, the case should usually be submitted to higher courts for review, and in the meantime the judges often would post their reports of the case in front of the gate of the court, and therefore the two sides and the public could understand the decisions and undertake their respective follow-up actions. By exposing the judicial process to the public, the Ming judicial system on one hand prevents the personal domination of the judge, on the other hand is a design to invite the common people to be involved in the judiciary. This talk employs the judicial reports collected in late Ming times to investigate how the local judges' decisions might have been influenced by the openness of their courts, as well as how they dealt with the contradictions among the principles of the law, the materials evidences, witness reports and the public opinions of the locality.

Click here for details and registration.

Back